Thanks for the reply.
I’ve seen that it’s an autosomal dominant mutation, so understand that if I don’t have it, neither will my offspring. It’s not been clear if my kids will be offered testing if I have it or if we’d have to push for it if we want it. It looks like it might fall into the case if testing prenatally would have been fine, but the way the legal ethics line up, they may need to wait until they can say they want it done?
We’re in Devon.
My sister is in California.
It seems there are differences in how things are done there vs here with this syndrome.
Thanks again.